Home/Blog/Reserved Instances vs Savings Plans
Back to Blog
Financial Planning
12 min read

Reserved Instances vs Savings Plans: Complete Comparison Guide

Financial planning dashboard showing investment comparison and savings strategies
Financial Analysis Team
January 12, 2024

AWS offers two primary ways to save money on compute costs: Reserved Instances (RIs) and Savings Plans. Both can deliver significant savings, but which is right for your organization? This comprehensive guide breaks down the differences, benefits, and best use cases for each option.

The Fundamentals

Reserved Instances (RIs)

Reserved Instances provide capacity reservations and billing discounts for specific instance types in specific Availability Zones. You commit to using a particular instance type for 1 or 3 years in exchange for significant discounts.

  • Savings: Up to 75% compared to On-Demand pricing
  • Commitment: Specific instance type, size, and AZ
  • Flexibility: Limited - tied to specific configurations
  • Capacity: Provides capacity reservation

Savings Plans

Savings Plans offer flexible pricing models that provide savings on compute usage. You commit to a consistent amount of usage (measured in $/hour) for 1 or 3 years.

  • Savings: Up to 72% compared to On-Demand pricing
  • Commitment: Dollar amount per hour, not specific instances
  • Flexibility: High - covers different instance types and regions
  • Capacity: No capacity reservation

📊 Quick Comparison

FeatureReserved InstancesSavings Plans
Max SavingsUp to 75%Up to 72%
FlexibilityLowHigh
Capacity ReservationYesNo
Best ForStable workloadsDynamic workloads
Pricing comparison and investment timeline visualization

Types of Savings Plans

Compute Savings Plans

The most flexible option, providing savings across:

  • EC2 instances (any family, size, AZ, region, OS, or tenancy)
  • AWS Fargate
  • AWS Lambda
  • Up to 66% savings on EC2

EC2 Instance Savings Plans

More restrictive but higher savings:

  • Applies to specific instance family in a specific region
  • Flexible across AZ, size, OS, and tenancy within that family
  • Up to 72% savings on EC2

When to Choose Reserved Instances

RIs are ideal when you have:

  • Stable, predictable workloads - Database servers, web servers with consistent traffic
  • Specific capacity requirements - Need guaranteed capacity in specific AZs
  • Homogeneous infrastructure - Standard instance types across your fleet
  • Maximum savings priority - Willing to sacrifice flexibility for highest discounts

💡 RI Best Practice

Start with Standard RIs for your most stable workloads, then use Convertible RIs for workloads that might change. You can always convert Standard to Convertible later.

When to Choose Savings Plans

Savings Plans work best for:

  • Dynamic workloads - Seasonal applications, development environments
  • Multi-service architectures - Using EC2, Fargate, and Lambda together
  • Uncertain future requirements - Expect to change instance types or regions
  • Simplified management - Want set-and-forget cost optimization

Real-World Examples

Example 1: E-commerce Website

Scenario: Consistent baseline traffic with seasonal spikes

Current: 20 m5.large instances running 24/7, 50 additional instances during peak seasons

Recommendation: RIs for baseline + Savings Plans for peak capacity

Savings: $18,000/year (43% reduction)

Example 2: Microservices Architecture

Scenario: Mix of EC2, Fargate, and Lambda with changing requirements

Current: $50,000/month across multiple services and regions

Recommendation: Compute Savings Plans for maximum flexibility

Savings: $180,000/year (30% reduction)

The Bottom Line

For most organizations, a hybrid approach works best: use Reserved Instances for your most stable, predictable workloads where you need capacity guarantees, and Savings Plans for everything else. This combination typically delivers 35-50% overall savings while maintaining operational flexibility.

Calculate Your Potential Savings

Use our Reserved Instances ROI Calculator to model different commitment scenarios and find the optimal strategy for your workloads: